WEST (WARD 2), SMITH (WARD 4) AND DOUGHERTY (WARD 6) DELIVER FOR HEALY

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HEALY'S VICTORY

Stark County Commissioner Pete Ferguson must be beside himself this morning to have to wake up to the news that Canton Democrats nominated William J. Healy, II to be the party standard bearer in the general election against Republican winner A.R. "Chip" Conde.

Healy has irreconcilable differences with the notion that anyone but he should be in charge when it comes to city/county consolidated 9-1-1, building departments, health departments and information technology departments.  His "my way or the highway attitude" makes it virtually impossible that Canton can find common ground with county government and other Stark municipalities to effect efficiencies through consolidation and merger.

Healy's victory over Stark County's leading regionalist (Smuckler) will likely harden his attitude. Moreover, other contributing factors to his standing firm - if not firmer - against any consolidations include:

• his blood feud with Republican Stark County Commissioner Janet Creighton whom he defeated in 2007 to become mayor.  Shortly after his win over her he trashed her as having left him with a mess to deal with when he took over on January 1, 2008,
• his falling out with fellow Democrat and Stark County Commissioner Tom Bernabei early on in his administration when, as service director and chief of staff, Bernabei had the temerity to differ with the mayor on various matters that came up in the day-to-day administration of Canton,
• Creighton's contribution to Conde ($1,100.00) in the pre-primary,
• Conde having been a key member of Creighton's administration as mayor of Canton,
• 9-1-1 Project Manager Joe Concatto having served in the Creighton administration and also on record as a contributor to the Conde campaign,
• Commissioner Ferguson's creation of a committee (headed by a key Smuckler campaign aide and former Stark County Commissioner Tom Harmon [both Democrats]) to look into the plausibility and desirability of consolidating the county and city building departments.  
• County Chief Administrator Mike Hanke's contribution to Bill Smuckler's campaign.

There may be other slights and differences that Healy harbors.  His history is that he does take such personally.  Of course, he will not admit that he is vendetta driven.  But that's The Report's take on him.

Now that Smuckler is history (and likely out of politics for good now), the only hope for Cantonians and Stark Countians who want to see more cooperation along the consolidation/merger line between Canton, county government and other local government entities is for them to get behind Republican Conde.

In order for Conde to defeat Healy, it will take a coalition of the few Republicans who remain in Canton and Smuckler Democrats as well as independents.  A major asset he will have in his corner is his former boss Janet Creighton.  Fortunate for him, as commissioner she has a base from which to operate to influence Cantonians who admire her (which includes not only Republicans, but many Democrats and independents as well) to vote for Conde.

Undoubtedly, Commissioners Bernabei and Ferguson will be weighing in against Healy.

HEALY'S VICTORY:  HOW DID HE DO IT?

Mayor William J. Healy parlayed his close relationship to Canton's predominately Afro-American wards into a sizable victory yesterday.  His margins in Wards 2 & 4 were about 70% of his nearly 600 vote margin.

Throughout the campaign the SCPR was hearing that Healy's focus would be on Canton's inner city and close into the city center wards as the way to victory over challenger and Councilman-at-Large William Smuckler.  Wards 2, 4 and 6 are in close proximity to one another.

Greg Hawk (a bitter opponent of the mayor) appears to have helped Smuckler run almost even with Healy in Ward 1 where Hawk was unsuccessfully challenged by a Healy ally and former Republican Bob Harper.

However, Smuckler needed a lot more than Hawk's help to pull off a win.  A couple weeks ago Smuckler told the SCPR his pollster told him he had a double digit lead.  Really?  Smuckler was also telling The Report that he would run well in the inner city.  Hmm?

To sum it up, Healy was blessed with having an uninspiring opponent who does not connect well with everyday people and, very importantly, union members who gave huge sums money for his campaign and walked the neighborhoods for him.

Healy's "worked like a charm" strategy was really pretty simple.  Get winning margins in seven of Canton's nine wards and watch Smuckler try to overcome the many with one ward - the 8th.

Despite Healy's troubled tenure as mayor, the colorless Smuckler was not a guy who was going to defeat him in a Democratic primary.

DOES CONDE HAVE A CHANCE?

Of course.  But it will not be easy.

He needs to start out now realizing how far behind he really is.  Unless he begins today and works tirelessly from now through general election day, the possibility will become an utter impossibility.

If he proves that he has the smarts and the determination to beat the master politician Healy, not only will he have won a political campaign; he will find that these qualities stand to make in the leader that Canton so sorely needs.

CAMPAIGN FINANCE: "SMUCKLER FOR MAYOR" - WHO SUPPORTS HIM?

 

When the SCPR talked with Canton Councilman-at-Large Bill Smuckler a few days ago, his conversation reeked with glorying in the fact that two of the Timken's heavy hitters (CEO James Griffith and VP - Gov't Affairs Bob Lapp) had come out as being for Smuckler for Mayor as between Smuckler and Mayor Healy.

But The Report asks:  for how long?

Probably until next Tuesday when the results of the Democratic primary become known as to who wins between incumbent Mayor William J. Healy, II and challenger Bill Smuckler.

Obviously, if Smuckler loses; the Timkens and their company leaders are not going to be supporting Healy against either Republican (Leon Gerig - A.R. "Chip" Conde), and, moreover, The Report, believes that it would be incredibly naive for Smuckler to think the Timkens would stay with him in the general election.

Nevertheless, it is important for Cantonians to be getting a signal from W.J. Timken et al (inasmuch as the Timken Company is about the only good thing going for Canton on the economic front these days) that in their judgment the Healy administration has not gotten the job done for Canton.

When one looks at Smuckler's pre-primary campaign report as well as that of Healy (the "out-of-towner") one is struck by the fact that most of the contributors are high rollers.  Smuckler is being bankrolled by a large number of company presidents, owners and the like.  However, Healy is not exactly standing on the street corner begging for passers by to contribute to his campaign effort.

Healy is getting heavy union support but not from individual contributions of folks who happen to be union member.  The contributions are "top-down" decisions to support Healy with large contributions that outstrip anything Smuckler is getting from the entrepreneurial/corporate bigs.

If Smuckler wins - and he is saying that his pollster indicates he enjoys a double digit lead currently - he will have to find a way to get back into the good graces of the Stark County union movement.  For the Timkens (the family and their company leadership) and their "good government fund" will be long gone and ensconced in the Republican cause.  After all, Bob Lapp is on the executive committee and the central committee of the Stark County Republican Party.

Undoubtedly, Smuckler is enjoying the Timken flirtation for as long as it lasts.  For the general election, he will have to turn to his "old" and "reliable" friends like the Slesnick family (relatives of his) for a good chunk of his campaign financing.

Here is Smuckler "entire list" of contributors as set forth on his pre-primary campaign finance report filed last Thursday: