Showing posts with label Vassar Park. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vassar Park. Show all posts

Thursday, September 12, 2013

(VIDEOS) WILL MAYOR HEALY EXERCISING HIS "PREROGATIVES OF OFFICE" RESULT IN CITIZEN-STAKEHOLDERS BEING CUT OUT OF MEETINGS IMPORTANT TO THEM?




IS HEALY SOWING THE SEEDS OF HIS OWN POLITICAL DESTRUCTION

VIDEOS

HEALY TALKS ABOUT HIS "PREROGATIVES AS MAYOR"
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CITIZEN REQUEST FOR INCLUSION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WILL THE EXCLUSION CONTINUE?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As the SCPR has frequently written: Canton mayor William J. Healy, II has an ego as large as the ill-fated ship: the Titanic.

And such is not unusual for politicians.

However, some of them get "so big for their britches" that their self-importance end up doing them in.

It is a little over a year and one half (May, 2015) before Healy has to face Canton's voters for a third time.

The question for the mayor is whether or not he will prove to be "his own worst enemy" (the ego factor) in his quest to seek a third term.

The Report has learned that there is activity underway to find a candidate to take the mayor on come 2015.  Those who want the mayor replaced understand that a Bill Smuckler will not do.  The candidate will have to be of the younger set and a person who is not open to the charge of being part of Canton government over the last 20 years or so which has seen the dramatic decline of the Hall of Fame city.

Moreover, his Democratic challenger (forget the Republicans putting up a viable candidate in November's general election) will have to have some personality.

While Healy is not Dale Carnegie, he is more accomplished - personality wise - than a number of the names being bandied about as possible opponents.

We have now come full circle to Healy's arrogance as being a critical factor (given that the criteria set forth above in finding a Democratic opponent), perhaps, in sinking him just as the Titantic was sent to the bottom of the Atlantic at the unwise hand of those navigating the behemoth ship.

While the mayor may be politically slick, such does not equate into being politically wise.

The SCPR picked up on the mayor's comments at this past Monday's Canton City Council meeting which might offer a clue as to whether or not the mayor is getting a handle on his ego.

The occasion was Group 175 spokesperson Bruce Nordman of Vassar Park appearing once again at the Public Speaks portion of Monday's City Council meeting.

Nordman's request was simple.  To paraphrase:  "Mister Mayor, please include us (Group 175/Vassar Park residents) in any meetings regarding solving of crime problems in our neighborhood."



The mayor's response?
In essence, (again a paraphrase) "it is a prerogative of the mayor to meet with whomever, wherever and for whatever reason "without including anyone from the public or the council."



As he nearly always does, the mayor tried - post council meeting - to convince his questioner (on whatever issue) that he is on top of the matter and will get it resolved BUT - his way.

Nordman spoke with Healy after Monday's meeting and so the SCPR was interested to find out from him whether or not the mayor had conceded to him, that is to say Group 175 and Vassar Park residents, that he would no longer out on his own conducting meetings which touch on their interests but exclude them and their councilperson (Frank Morris, Ward 9).

Answer:  "no such luck."

All the mayor would commit to was that he would include Cantonians/council members or whomever, where he deemed it appropriate to include them.



The "where he deemed it appropriate language" means that the mayor is sticking to exercising his prerogatives of office.

Healy has been doing so for nearly six years now and where has it gotten Canton?

Answer:  into a steeper and steeper decline.

While he may resemble William Jefferson Clinton for those who see the former president as "Slick Willie," Healy clearly does not have the communication skills of Clinton.

And that may be his undoing come the next election.

All that Healy's seeming arrogance has gained him is a growing list of those who want to put him on the political sidelines.

Nobody thought the biggest and baddest ship of its time would sink.  However, the "undetected," "unseen" iceberg made believers of everybody.

It is looking more and more to the SCPR that Healy's ignoring of "the little people" may prove to be his political iceberg.

After all, one must maintain the prerogatives of office, no?

Monday, March 25, 2013

VIDEOS: FINALLY! CANTON MAYOR WILLIAM HEALY, II IS GOING TO HAVE HIS ZERO TOLERANCE RHETORIC SHOVED RIGHT DOWN HIS POLITICAL THROAT?



UPDATED 03/26/2013 AT 8:00 AM

 VIDEOS

----------------------------------------------------

Bruce Nordman
at
Canton City Council on Jail Beds
March 4, 2013 

----------------------------------------------------

Nordman
Moore
Stark Co. Commissioners
on
"Award to Commissioners"
&
on
Getting Canton to 175 Police Officers
March 20, 2013

----------------------------------------------------

Councilman Joe Cole
Canton Policing
&
His "Popsickle Stick Index" 
October 19, 2009 

-----------------------------------------------------

Mayor William J. Healy, II
Defining Zero Tolerance
June 6, 2011   
 
For two elections now Cantonians have bought into what the SCPR thinks has been Mayor William J. Healy, II's ongoing political scam on solving the Hall of Fame city's rampant crime problem.

The scam?

Zero Tolerance Crime in Canton!

That's it, folks!!

The SCPR wrote an incisive blog on June 7, 2011 (a must read as a refresher for The Report's readers - LINK)

It appears to the SCPR that Canton's citizens are finally wising up to what The Report believes to have been a political ruse and are about to - re: the Healy administration and some Healy-aligned-members of Canton City Council - call checkmate on the chess-like stratagem called Zero Tolerance.

If he really had the smarts that he thinks he has, the mayor should have figured out three weeks ago that "the gig was up" on his: it amounts to a  political rhetoric only Zero Tolerance.

In his State of the City message of March 14th, Healy feigned that he was dealing with the police shortage problem in announcing that he was adding 14 new police to the Canton force.

But even that announcement was a "smoke and mirrors" exercise because in the end, in working through retirements and other personnel adjustments, the Healy administration is likely to be adding a half-a-dozen or so officers perhaps to as high as a police force of 150. 

The SCPR believes that civic activists Nordman and friends are committed to - not as a matter of political rhetoric - but as a matter of reality to make Canton zero tolerant of crime and thereby begin to restore Canton to her former greatness.

It appears to the SCPR that the Vassar Park folks have thrust themselves into a lead role in actually solving Canton's crime problem in a multifaceted approach.

Their number of approaches appear to be expanding as the activists get more understanding of the dimension, scope, and factors at play in their grappling with the problem too much crime in Canton.

So far they have a three-pronged program of action, to wit:
  • Get the jail fully utilized at 501 beds,
    • The Healy administration has used the underutilization as an excuse for continued unacceptable level of crime in Canton
  • Get the police manpower levels up to 175 officers,
    •  
    • Note:  Focus on the decline in numbers of officers/number of arrests in the Healy years as mayor.  Accordingly to Healy, Canton is less crime infested than with 33 less officers in the Creighton administration:  who will believe that?
  • Get the quality of the CPD higher by offering competitive wages in relation to other area police department
    • Healy administration opposes ordinance to raise beginning officers' pay
These folks are not politicians.  Mayor Healy is.  Who do you trust to make zero tolerance of crime in Canton anywhere near becoming the actual state of affairs in the city?

On March 4, 2013, Bruce Nordman appeared before Canton City Council and got on Council and the Healy administration to do something in the way of getting the Stark County sheriff to bring the county jail capacity up to full utilization at 501 beds.  On the 4th about 400 beds were in use.

Here see Nordman in action.



That particular Nordman initiative was an easy one for council to dispose of inasmuch as they have no say in how the Stark County jail is run.

Of course, every public official at the council meeting was sympathetic and supportive but powerless in terms of correcting the deficiency.

The following day Nordman appeared at the regular weekly meeting of the Stark County commissioners.

At that meeting he succeeded in getting the commissioners to bring the sheriff in the following week for some answers.

The result?

On March 13th, Sheriff George Maier (an appointee of Stark County Democratic Party) under bizarre circumstances (i.e. told a local reporter before the meeting about his decision to increase bed space before telling the commissioners, an omission he later apologized for), jacked up the bed use to 450 beds.

Interestingly enough during the meeting itself (after having already made the decision to go to 450 beds [unbeknownst to anyone other than the reporter) that it would take months to get to the 501 level.

Hmm?

Pretty impressive that Nordman could get action so soon, no?

Again, the point is that if Healy is so bright he should have figured out that he would be next in Nordman's sights.

Here is an extract from Canton City Council minutes of what Nordman said on March 18th which should have been a heads up to Healy, to wit:
Good evening....good evening, my name is Bruce Nordman. I reside at 1623 Logan Avenue, NW. Good evening to Council President and the Mayor. A belated thank you also to the Council... to the Council Members.

This evening I’m coming before you because I would like to talk about police ranks as it relates to crime in the City.

At the end of this meeting we are going to pass out the crimes as they have gone from 2,400 with a strength of 175 Police Officers to about 1,600 last year. We would ask that you give this some study.

We’ll be back next week and would be looking for your answer.
Again, I thank you for your time and interest.  (emphasis added)
Afterwards Nordman tells the SCPR that Council President Allen Schulman told him:
  1. To marshal his forces (i.e. the Vassar Park folks) to get the Ohio Legislature to provide adequate local government funding to the likes of Canton so that the city has the funding to bring on more policemen, and
  2. To look at the city budget and come up with a plan of his own whereby monies would be available to hire more policemen
 Hmm?

On Schulman's item #1, take a good look at this goody. 


Can you believe it?

Canton's representative - Democrat Stephen Slesnick - to the Ohio House of Representatives is going to be in Akron tonight after having been asked back in February by Councilman Schulman to come to Canton City Council to explain the state funding cuts.

The SCPR has asked Slesnick's office when he is going to be appearing before Canton City Council.

Guess what?  No response.

He can't answer the Stark County-based Stark County Political Report nor Canton City Council, but he can appear in Akron.

Now if Slesnick's insult to Canton and Stark County is not enough for Cantonians to find another state representative come next year's Democratic primary, then nothing is, no?

On Schulman's item #2, Nordman tells the SCPR that "Hell will freeze over first" (the SCPR's interpretation; not Nordman's actual words) before he takes on the job of the administration and/or council members.

Tonight look for Nordman to tell council and the Healy administration such in his three minutes before council.

Healy et al should take Bruce Nordman very seriously.

A quote: "The gauntlet is down.  We intend to pursue this aggressively (i.e. the increase of the Canton police force to 175 officers). 

The day after his appearance at Canton City Council on the increase of police strength (to 175 officers), he was back to the commissioners with a Canton Citizens Award to Commissioners Bernabei, Creighton and Regula and to ask them to help in applying pressure on Canton City Council and Mayor Healy to get the Canton police force up to 2007 levels, the year Healy was elected as mayor. (emphasis added)


As Nordman sees it, for Stark County to be a safe community to which businesses are likely to be attracted, it is of critical importance that Canton get its crime problem under control.

Here is Nordman's full presentation at the Stark County commissioners meeting last Wednesday.

(Note - video includes the commissioners' response and also including remarks/inquiry by Vassar resident Bret Moore):



The SCPR completely agrees with Nordman.

For Stark County to thrive economically, the first order of business is for the county seat to be relatively crime free.

An ancillary issue to this citizen group call for an increase in police department strength is the matter of the pay that new police officers get.

It is absolutely ridiculous.

Entry pay in Canton is $26,000 per year (which becomes $33,000 when a hiree becomes certified generally a year or so later; an experienced police officer hires in at $33,000).  This according to Sam Sliman who is Canton's civil service director.

Also, last Monday Nordman colleague Bruce Brewer said this:
Yes, my name is Bruce Brewer. I reside at 1520 Harvard Avenue NW in Canton, Ohio.

Ladies and gentlemen of Canton City Council, it has come to our attention that the beginning wages for the new recruits for the City of Canton is so low that candidates applying for the spot and...and trained by the City of Canton would seek employment in a different County or different City.

We are asking Council to re look at the starting wage for the new officers. We sit here at City Council, the average wage being $17,000.00 for a part time job. We ask our Police Officers as a new recruit to strap on a weapon and...and go throughout the City of Canton and put their lives in danger, whether it be a girl or a man for $24,000.00
[SCPR Note:  actually $26,000] a year.   ... .
Guess what it is in Akron?

$42,390 TO $49,504.


Well, if you were going to lay your life on the line which would be the more attractive pay incentive?

And guess what?

The politicized zero tolerance mayor is resisting a move by about half of Canton City Council to raise the pay for new officers.

It is stuff like the lowering of the numbers of policemen on the street and their pay level which tell a good part of the commitment or lack thereof of Canton officials to zero tolerance.

Councilman Joe Cole (a Democrat) is in particular, in the opinion of the SCPR, a political hypocrite.

Below is a video of Cole when he was running for Canton council-at-large (he is running against fellow Democrat Frank Morris in the 9th Ward) back in 2009 had to say about his commitment to policing in Canton.

On October 19, 2009 at a community forum for candidates seeking office Cole made the interesting observation that he observed that it would be community activists who would solve Canton's problems.

Moreover, it is ironic that he (at-large and Finance Committee chairman) and Councilman Griffin (Democrat - 3rd Ward) were the Healy administration's point men on council to kill a request in January of this year by Members Cirelli, Fisher, Hawk, Mack, Mariol and Morris that Canton get competitive in attracting quality applicants for its police force.


Here is the October, 2009 Cole video with him speaking on policing issues and in particular his Popsickle Stick Index of Safety:  "It is an unacceptable standard of safety in which a child cannot be allowed to go to a neighborhood store for a popsickle."



Even if the rest of council opposed the measure, Council President Allen Schulman would have had the deciding vote and thereby could have helped that Canton do the right thing in terms of making the beginning salary attractive enough that the very best candidates would apply to become a Canton policeman.

The SCPR believes that Schulman would side with the proposers of the change.

Schulman has a history of putting his money where his mouth is.

And this proposed legislation provides him an opportunity to do so.

Leader Dougherty needs to revive the effort and thereby provide a vote opportunity which will show who on council cares about the quality of Canton's police force and who does not.

The SCPR ends this blog with the video of Mayor Healy on June 6, 2011 defining zero tolerance and the Canton effort at zero tolerance.

As far as The Report is concerned, this presentation is a political performance.  And note the soon-to-be-resigned safety director (Thomas Ream) nodding his head in full agreement with the mayor.  No wonder Canton's crime footprint has in reality grown larger notwithstanding Healy's protestation to the contrary.

LINK to prior blog showing Canton crime rate as being 4 on a scale of 100 with 100 being a completely safe city.


And to further show his commitment (sarcasm) to effective Canton policing only this past week announced that Canton would no longer have a full time safety director for the next six to 12 months.

Warren Price is a capable city official.  However, there is no way he can be an effective service director, chief-of-staff, safety director, and annexation director all-at-one-time.

No way!

To the SCPR, Mayor William J. Healy,II has by his downgrading of the numbers of Canton police on the street, supporting a non-competitive salary, and going to a part-time safety director and thereby overburdening Price shows his true stripes.

The SCPR believes Healy's zero tolerance political rhetoric is a political scam on the people of Canton and, moreover, anyone who has an occasion to be in Canton, either as a resident or to visit to do social, cultural, government or business activities, has their personal safety hanging in the balance on the outcome of the good work of the Vassar Park residents.

These folks live in the heart of Canton.  Mayor William J. Healy, II lives out on 52nd Street.


Not quite the same vulnerability to the effects of crime, no?

If one lives on 52nd Street, it is easier to game zero tolerance for political purposes, no?

Thursday, March 14, 2013

INTERESTING? SHERIFF MAIER SHARES PLAN TO EXPAND JAIL BED UTILIZATION TO 450 BEDS WITH REP REPORTER BEFORE TELLING COUNTY COMMISSIONERS?



VIDEOS

Sheriff Maier "Unhappy?"About Suggestion that Sometimes Police Pass on Arresting 

Full Footage on Commissioners/Maier/Citizens Interaction on the "Unfilled Jail Beds" Problem

Nobody knew at the time (except for the Repository reporter sitting in the back of the room), but Bruce Nordman and his friends from the Vassar Park Neighborhood Association walked away from Wednesday's regular meeting of the Stark County commissioners with a seeming stunning victory.

Sheriff George T. Maier had made a determination earlier in the day that he is going to immediately expand the Stark County jail by 50 beds from its current 400 or thereabout to 450.  So it seems.

But neither the Nordman followers nor the commissioners (except maybe for Bernabei, and only "sort of") had information at the meeting itself of "the earlier in the day made decision."

Hmm?

A week ago, Nordman et al surprised the commissioners in showing up at the meeting of March 6 (LINK to the SCPR blog on that meeting) and demanding that they do what they could to keep their November, 2011 sales tax passage promise.  

What promise?  

To see to it that the criminal justice system would get restored in full including the full utilization of the county jail at 501 beds.

Commissioner Thomas Bernabei says he did have an inkling that Maier was to the point of going public with a full blown plan.

Over lunch (which occurred over the 1:00 to 1:30 time frame) with Maier on Wednesday, Bernabei tells the SCPR that Maier made a vague reference to working out a plan whereby in tinkering with the numbers he could perhaps come up with additional beds in the more immediate future.

In Wednesday's meeting itself,  Maier claimed that he did not have the personnel to properly oversee additional bed occupancy - as of yesterday.

Mind you, not a word during the meeting of what he had already passed on to The Rep.

Interesting, no?

Moreover, at yesterday's meeting he would not be pinned down by Cantonian Pete DeGiacomo's direct question as to when he projected that all 501 Stark County jail beds would be filled.

Apparently, the massaging of the numbers that came up in the Bernbei/Maier luncheon conversation had to do with making the additional beds available to "trustie" prisoners.

When the SCPR informed Commissioners Bernabei and Creighton last night in a telephone conversation that Maier has provided The Repository with a scoop not only over the Akron Beacon Journal and the Alliance Review but also over the commissioners themselves, it was obvious that both were surprised.

And, of course, the citizens from Vassar Park had to be surprised too when they read the news late yesterday afternoon or last night (of course, well after yesterday's meeting had ended) in an online "Canton.com staff report" which was posted at 1:59 p.m. on Wednesday, some 29 minutes into the commissioners meeting.

The posting has to mean that the Rep correspondent had to have done so immediately prior to the beginning of the meeting.

What the SCPR thinks Maier may have achieved by this apparent bypassing of the commissioners was:
  1. hurt his own credibility in being forthright with the citizens who engaged him at the commissioners meeting, and
  2. damage (as in collateral damage) the splendid reputation that the commissioners have built up since they (Bernabei and Creighton) took office in November, 2010 and January of 2011, respectively,
  3. endeared himself to the bigs at The Rep so as to get favorable press going forward
The Report is convinced, based on a telephone conversation with her last night, that Commissioner Creighton knew nothing of the plan Maier had unfolded before yesterday's meeting to the newspaper.  And, it is likely that Commissioner Regula was also unaware.

The SCPR has enormous respect for Commissioner Bernabei. However it is hard to understand how he could sit through the meeting without breathing a word of his luncheon conversation with Maier to the Vassar Park folks and, indeed, all assembled at the meeting.

His justification to The Report was that he thought that the plan was merely in the thinking stage.

Here is how the essential language read in The Repository:
Sheriff George T. Maier said he and jail administrator Maj. Brian Arnold made the decision Tuesday to open a 50-bed cell block to house the jail’s trusties, which are inmates with privileges who help clean and maintain the jail.

Maier said he intends to notify the courts of the additional jail space today. Since July, the jail, which has a capacity to hold 501 inmates, has remained at 400 beds.
In the thinking stage?

Hmm?  Where is that swamp land located?

For someone who says that he is committed to transparency, withholding even what he thought was "in the planning stages material" is incomprehensible.

Even something being in the works is matter that the Vassar Park people and likely the many Stark County taxpayers would have wanted to hear during the meeting.

Rightly or wrongly, many Vassar Parks residents equate the unused beds at the county jail as contributing to not getting the criminals off of neighborhood streets.

For George T. Maier to have seemingly worked the commissioners over on this one was very unwise.

The man Maier is currently on a honeymoon of sorts with Stark County officials.

Bernabei, a man who does pass out accolades lightly, is clearly enamored with the new sheriff.

Commissioner Creighton has told The Report that she has been impressed with his plans for improving sheriff department operations if he remains as Stark County sheriff.

Like Commissioner Bernabei, yours truly has very high standards as to who gets high marks and who gets low marks in terms of public office holding but The Report thinks that there are too many unanswered questions about Maier.

In terms of formal credentials (except, of course, those thought by some to be lacking as seemingly required by Ohio law), Maier's are about as impressive as they get for a county sheriff.

But as yours truly told Bernabei last night, being an effective and credible public official is more than achieving certifications, degrees, training, experience and the like.

The Report thinks that temperament for the job is critically important for anyone who wears a law enforcement uniform and carries gun.

For anyone who will look at some of the things that have been said in the past about Maier, to wit:
the so called "honeymoon period" should be just that and let's just wait and see if:
  1. he remains Stark County sheriff (he is under challenge in the Ohio Supreme Court for lacking strict statutory requirements - LINK), and 
  2. whether or not he can keep his composure under job pressure
Bernabei says he thinks that Maier has done admirably well given the pressure of learning a new job, the court challenge to his qualifications and struggling to hire enough deputies to be able to utilize all 501 beds available at the county jail.

To The Report, the apparent embarrassment he has subjected the commissioners to (assuming that the local reporter got her story accurately from Maier) with his statement published in the local newspaper is not a good sign.

As said earlier, such was not exactly an Einstein moment.

Perhaps another sign that he has difficulty handling seemingly outrageous statements by citizens an underlying anger (understandable, though it may be) appears to be present in the following video (note the finger pointing) in which he engages Nordman on a statement made during the meeting that police sometimes give a pass on making arrests when they know that there isn't enough jail bed space to house them, to wit:



Another troublesome sign occurred when he and his sidekick Major Brian Arnold protested that the sheriff's department has "never" since 1986 (and a federal lawsuit) turned away an arrested person because of lack of bed space.

Never?

Maybe just a little bit of an overstatement?

Moreover, The Report has had a few rough outings with him likely due to the fact that he hasn't much liked the blogs that yours truly has written about him and his brother and former Stark County Democratic Party chairman Johnnie A. Maier, Jr among others of his Massillon based political friends.

In fact, after he first appeared before the commissioners on Feburary 11th of this year, he collared yours truly and wanted to have a little confrontation about those blogs.

As he soon found out during the encounter, the SCPR does not think a person who wears a uniform, even a sheriff's uniform, is God Almighty.

And The Report can do without the "high privilege" of having press access to him. 

Unless a public official is willing to take the tough questions, they are not worth questioning/interviewing except perhaps for mere information.  Certainly not for investigative/accountability reporting.

However, all too many in the media are too often willing to play "patty cakes" with these supersensitive officials so that they can get copy material for articles.

The SCPR is not one of them.

Isn't just wonderful for Maier to willingly take taxpayer dollars and think he can pick and choose who he will bless with an audience on the implicit condition that they not ire him with embarrassing questions?

In the end, the victor seems to be Stark Countians.

But for the action of Citizen Bruce Nordman and his fellows out of Vassar Park, the SCPR is convinced that Sheriff George Maier would not have found the ability to come up with 50 more occupied beds at the Stark County jail.

For the sake of Stark County which has been through some very tough times with its public officials of late, if Maier remains Stark County sheriff, the SCPR trusts that he proves to be an effective and credible Stark County public official.

The full video of the Stark County commissioners meeting as it pertains to the staffing issue at the Stark County Jail.

See for yourself that nobody utters a word about the 50 beds for "trustie" inmates.

Talk about an elephant being in the room?