For
Stark County only, the Stark County Political Report believes that the
four listed in the graphic above will prove to be the most interesting and, perhaps, the most significant.
This blog is a revision of one published on February
18th. Why a revision? For a couple of reasons.
First, Richard
Reinbold has made himself uncompetitve in the 29th Ohio Senate race by
eschewing PAC money. The saying is that "money is the mother's milk of
politics." Reinbold's action is admirable, but going up against the
well-established Scott Oelslager is not a race one takes on without mucho, mucho
campaign funds.
The SCPR is told that the Ohio Senate Democratic Caucus has no money to put into the Reinbold effort. And, The Report has learned, Reinbold was not the first choice anyway. Both county Auditor Kim Perez and Plain Township Trustee Louis Giavasis were preferred over Reinbold to make the run at Oelslager.
As if the Senate Democrats are in a position to prefer anyone. The Caucus is a pathetic excuse for an organized political entity. Senate minority leader Capri Cafaro has proved to be an ineffective leader.
Apparently, Reinbold is looking to surprise us all and defeat
Oelslager by being the unconventional candidate and thereby appeal to an
electorate that seems to be tiring of "politics as usual."
The SCPR wishes him well, but The Report does not think this
gambit will work to generate interest among Stark County voters.
Moreover, Reinbold by force of his personality does not generate
excitement. Couple having no money with a dull personality and you have
a contest that loses its place in the SCPR top four Stark County races
for 2010.
Second, The Report's listing of the Meeks/Creighton face-off as
the number one attention getter in Stark County politics this year needs
a little more explanation.
While the SCPR believes the Snitchler/Bosley match up will be the
closest race this fall (likely to remain too close for the SCPR to call
right up to election day), its intensity of interest will be for folks
like yours truly, the pols in Columbus and, of course, the voters of the
50th Ohio House district. Not as much in other parts of Stark County
which also has the 51st district (Haines [Democrat] v. Schuring
[Republican]) and the 52nd (Slesnick [Democrat] v. Secrest
[Republican]).
For the
foregoing reasons, the SCPR thinks Meeks/Creighton is the top race.
MEEKS/CREIGHTON
Former Canton mayor Janet
Creighton entering this field for the full-term commissioner seat being
vacated by Commissioner Todd Bosley made this contest #1 on the SCPR's
list. Another factor in bringing this contest to the #1 ranking is that all of Stark County will be voting whereas on the Snitchler/Bosley match-up; only about 1/3rd of Stark County will be voting.
Steve Meeks was appointed by the Stark County Democratic Central
Committee to the seat formerly held by Tom Harmon. But Meeks wants no
part of coming up for re-election in two years. The next two years may
be the most difficult that Stark County (in the government sense) has
ever faced.
Why?
Because there is no money and there is not going to be any new
money for the foreseeable future. Maybe, and only maybe, there might be a
renewal of the existing sales tax.
How will this
impact running for commissioner in 2012 for an incumbent?
This way.
The
commissioners will have to make draconian cuts in county services to
Stark Countians. And the cuts are not going to set well. The public
really does expect the commissioners to take care of the entire county
with a few fishes and loaves. When the manna from Heaven stops raining,
then the grumbling will start and in the end sitting commissioners will
be the butt of citizen anger.
So 2012 is not
a time to be running for re-election. That's why Meeks ducked out of
the two years left on his term for the four years that Commissioner
Bosley would have stood for if he had not decided to run for state
representative (the 50th).
Meeks might have made an unwise choice. Had he
stayed in the two-year term race, he would have won hands down as former
Canton law director, city councilman, chief of staff and service
director (Healy administration) will. However, Bernabei likely just
plans to be a commissioner for two years to do what he can to help
straighten Stark County finances out and then move on with his life.
Another thing
that Meeks had planned on was who his opponent would be on the full
term.
Undoubtedly, his jaw dropped when he saw that former Canton mayor
and countywide officeholder Janet Creighton had taken out a petition.
And so it
should.
It is pretty clear to the SCPR that Meeks cannot defeat Creighton
and that he will be giving up his commissioner's seat come December 31,
2010.
A Creighton victory will be good for Stark County. Democrats
have had a stranglehold over countywide offices for a number of years
now. Such has turned out to be a bad trip for the county.
BOSLEY/SNITCHLER
Number 2 on
the SCPR list.
Why?
Because this seat is a Republican gerrymandered one
designed to keep a "safe district" Republican in the Ohio House. The
gerrymandering sheltered the lazy, politically inept John Hagan for a
full 8 years in the House. Hagan proved his political ineptness when -
notwithstanding his long run as a Stark County politician - he lost to
political novice Pete Ferguson over a 2008 commissioners position in a
politically competitive environment.
However, with
the entry of Todd Bosley into the 50th Ohio House district seat, there
is a chance that the Republican "fix" will become unfixed.
Had he not
been the leading architect for the imposing of a 0.50 of a percent
countywide sales/use tax increase in December, 2008, Bosley likely would
be a shoe-in to win the 50th.
Because he did
the "politically" wrong thing to do, he is reduced in the SCPR's
opinion to having a chance to win the 50th.
Bosley will be
hammering away at Snitchler as being a "do-nothing," "right-wing
ideologue" state representative. Moreover, Snitchler's political romance with the right wing of Stark County Republicans (the teabaggers) could end up costing him the election. He spoke at the original teabagger event on April 15, 2009 and is scheduled to speak once again at a teabagger event in Navarre on June 27th.
Snitchler, on
the other hand, will - one way or another - play to the imposed tax as
indicating that Bosley will be a "tax and spend" Democrat if he were to
be sent to Columbus. The Report has been told that "Vote No Increased Taxes" member Tom Marcelli (Bethlehem Township - the home of Navarre) will be working on the Snitchler campaign.
This could be a good development for Snitchler. He could appear to be taking the "above it all" road while letting the likes of Marcelli and his "Vote No" friends hammer Bosley on the imposed tax. If the Vote Nos can turn a substantial portion of the 60 plus percent of "no" voting Stark Countians on the retention of the tax into Snitchler voters, such could be a difference-maker positive for Snitchler.
One other important note about the outcome of
Bosley/Snitchler.
Could a loss by either be the end of a a Stark County
political career?
BOCCIERI/RENACCI
This race will be won or lost in Stark County, Although the 16th congressional district includes Wayne County and parts of Medina and Ashland, Stark will dominate.
Jim Renacci has made a huge blunder in his campaign. He has drifted to the right of the Republican Party. In order to win in the 16th, one needs to be at least "right, center."
The reason that three (Stark, Medina and Wayne) of the four county Republican chairmen endorsed Renacci in the Republican primary was that he was perceived to be the most moderate and therefore the most capable of winning in November. Otherwise, the person to get behind would have been Matt Miller of Ashland County who gave Ralph Regula and Kirk Schuring (2008) all they wanted in terms of competition for the Republican nomination.
The SCPR expected Renacci to be way more moderate in his views than Miller, Smith and Schiffer. But he wasn't. Everything that The Report saw coming out of the Renacci camp was: "How can I appeal to the Miller and Schiffer" crowd.
Jim Rennaci should be going nowhere near the Navarre teabagger event scheduled for June 27th. But he is. And his doing so will help solidify in the mind of Stark Countians that Renacci is a Republican right type candidate.
Very few, if any, right wing voters are going to vote for incumbent Congressman John Boccieri (Democrat - Alliance). However, Boccieri is a conservative Democrat who will play well in the district. Especially well in the Stark County part of the district.
So for Reanacci to court the teabaggers is like preaching to the choir. And the choir will vote for him. There are just not enough of them in the 16th to elect him.
There is plenty for Renacci to go after Boccieri on: Flip-flopping just to name one (cap and trade as well as healthcare). However, he will be so hung up on the right wing lunacy that he, in critiquing Boccieri, will sound likes Michele Bachman of Minnesota. The right wing message will not play in most of Stark County.
Also, in this election for Stark Countians, Renacci is the outsider. Boccieri is a Stark Countian for two years now. Rennacci is not even a native Ohioan. Rather a Pennsylvainian. So he will not be able to whip up the winds of discontent on Boccieri being a capetbagger. No much of a loss for Renacci, as we all saw how much of a non-issue that was with voters for Schuring in 2008.
By the way, if Kirk Schuring were running this time around, he would do much better in Stark County and, perhaps, be able to eke out a narrow victory.
Even so (Renacci drifting to the political right), Boccieri/Renacci will be a competitive race. Boccieri will not win by the roughly 10% (as predicted early on by the SCPR) he won by against Stark Countian Kirk Schuring. More like about three or four percentage points this time around.
This is not a Democratic year for congressional races. That Boccieri wins in an off year for Democrats means that he could be on his way to being a long-term congressman from Ohio's 16th congressional district.
PEREZ/HAROLD
The main
question here is: Will Alan Harold stay in this race?
Two years ago
he was slated to run against the now-beleaguered Gary Zeigler (Stark
County treasurer). But he didn't. The "story on the street" is that
Harold's employer asked him to step aside after high-level state
Democrats complained about Harold's candidacy to Huntington.
The SCPR asked
Harold about this story. His response: "No comment."
Harold's whole
handing of the Zeigler thing leads The Report to believe that Harold
has no stomach for "down and dirty" politics.
And if he gets
queasy about roughhouse politics, taking on Stark County auditor Kim
Perez is not the place to be in a run for political office.
Although
somewhat of a maverick in Stark County Democratic politics with his own
political base (much like Commissioner Todd Bosley), he is a political
power broker and likely will teach Harold a political lesson that Harold
will not forget for years.
Harold will learn that taking on Perez is not like
showing up at a Congressman John Boccieri campaign event (at the Sunoco
station on Tuscarawas) with a sign in hand and yelling at the top of
one's lungs.
Perhaps, in the light of the BP Gulf of Mexico massive oil leak, Harold would like to do an encore performance of his "drill, baby, drill" chant at the Sunoco station?
And it is not like running for a place on the Stark County
Educational Service Center (formerly known as the Stark County Board of
Education).
Apparently, the board candidacy was a "dry run" for taking on
Perez. Well, if Harold duplicates that effort in his vying with Perez,
he will be looking wistfully at his numbers achieved in the board race
(he narrowly lost).
Another campaign like that one
will leave him a distant, distant second in a two-man race!
1 comment:
Martin: I still don't think the Schnichler/Bosley race will be as close as everyone thinks...that 65% against the tax vote back in Novemeber was as much a vote against Bosley as it was against the tax, and one year will not be enough to placate the electorate, that is too short a period of time. Also factor in the proverbial open mouth insert foot moment of calling taxpayers "terrorists" then trying to retract is pretty good bulletin board (and billboard material) for the Snitchler camp...I would not let that gift horse get away. I think the Dems can throw all the money they want at the race just like they did in New Jersey, Virginia, and Massachusetts, they might be just as well off to give it to charity than waste it on Bosley. And don't discount or marginalize the teabaggers, they have been steadily picking up steam.
Bosley's track record as commissioner is spotty at best, 911 is not fixed as promised, the commissioners have not been timely in making cuts, and something as simple as the county pound has bad Bosley fingerprints all over it with the hiring of Tom Harmon's son, and Bosley circumventing the committee to possibly hire a "chrony"...not a very wise decision given his hopes for higher office.
Post a Comment