For The Repository, the editorial endorsement writing doesn't get much better than what the writer did today in the newspaper's endorsement of Rick Campbell for the office of Stark County Recorder.
But it is deficient in several respects.
First and foremost, the editors fail to take full advantage of its "right-on" analysis of Campbell's cutting edge online accomplishment of citizen access to the recorder stored public records.
This is odd as The Rep folks say they are for more public access. When they have the attention of readers (and certainly all of Stark County's elected officials), they drop the ball.
If the editors were more global in their thinking processes, they would posit the Campbell accomplishment as a challenge to all other Stark County officeholders to, in the words of "the good book;" go and do likewise.
Second, is there anything to critique Rick Campbell on?
Of course.
The STARK COUNTY POLITICAL REPORT (The Report) can think of one biggy right off the top of the head.
Campbell is a "card-carrying" member of the Stark County Democratic Party political machine put together by Chairman Johnnie A. Maier, Jr., Campbell's mother-in-law and former Stark County commissioner Gayle Jackson, and Randy Gonzalez (Jackson Township fiscal officer and a Phil Giavasis employee at the Canton Municipal Court Clerk of Courts office) among others which (the machine) uses to staff government offices with machine loyal employees.
To be fair, Republicans have done this themselves. Does anyone forget how Jane Vignos (retiring county commissioner) and Janet Creighton used the auditor's office (now it's Democrat Kim Perez's turn) to house loyalist Stark County Republicans who just happen to be first-in-line when it comes to staffing party political campaigns?
The point. If Campbell was all he could be, he would break this vicious cycle of political parties using the public payroll to warehouse "so-so" workers (not necessarily very best you can get - though one could get lucky), who become the vanguard of political campaigns.
The Report agrees with The Rep editors that Campbell stands out as a county official. But the question remains.
Doesn't a first-rate editorial board use the endorsement process to challenge endorseea to be even better and, what's more, - when performing at a high level - as a model for their peers?
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
DISCUSSION: THE REP'S CAMPBELL ENDORSEMENT IS ABOUT AS GOOD AS THE EDITORIAL BOARD CAN DO - BUT IT IS STILL LACKING?
Labels:
auditor,
Campbell,
Commissioners,
Democrats,
Jackson,
Maier,
perez,
Republicans,
Vignos
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment